“Now in the Star Trek Series, the ship is pretty high tech. … The person who is really in charge is up on the bridge. And the plot of each episode is the same. … Suddenly the ship goes out of control for some reason or another. And the captain starts yelling from the bridge ‘I’ve lost control! I’ve lost control of the ship!’ Now, losing control is the worst thing that could happen.” Laurie Anderson
Writing these essays has helped me more clearly see the truths of my heart. The explorations have expanded my courage to be compassionate with myself and others. This has greatly improved my life. If these essays have given you some of these benefits, I would be honoured if you would support my work by becoming a paid subscriber. Thank you. 🙏
Guy’s Preamble to the Sarah and Guy Conversation that Ensued
Sarah watched Steve Kirsch of the VSRF (Vaccine Safety Research Foundation interview the deep researcher Sasha Latypova.
Full Episode #76: Whose Military Made Covid?
Latypova presents pretty much irrefutable evidence that the covid pandemic was a planned military operation by the USA DoD and, from that, I infer their Deep State handlers. (The evidence that this was and is part of a long term plan is supported by the carefully crafted legal changes over decades that were required to enable civil and (in America) constitutional laws to be by-passed in order for the ‘emergency’ orders to be implemented when given. For that history see Bailiwick News by Katherine Watt.)
Steve refused to accept the argument or the evidence. He didn’t actually refute it. Rather it looked to me that it was too much truth about how evil this is for his understanding to accept.
There was some flaccid ‘Why’ questions from Steve about genocide on this scale, and why use injections, which are notoriously inefficient, in his opinion. And he sure wanted to like Gates and the Gates’ toilet fund.
Sarah’s article was her play-by-play and colour commentary of the interview. It is a delightful read, and tweaked my curiosity to see what Sarah may have missed. She didn’t miss anything, actually.
Sarah’s Colour Summary: A Taste Of Her Acuity And Wit
[Latypova] goes over a brief history of how the legal framework was laid to allow for what has happened….EUA, OTA countermeasures. The data Steve is so excited about is irrelevant because these are countermeasures. This is a global act of war and governments are lying to [the] public.
Steve wants to know WHY WHY WHY, also who, but WHY??? Is it like, China? Or Bill Gates? China? Bill?
Steve says that he is “naïve”, “playing devil’s advocate”…just an innocent bystander, asking innocent questions.
And he wants China Bill Gates the smoking gun…
Who is in control, Who is in command??? [As I was editing this I experienced the Star Trek control portion of Laurie Anderson’s concert. See above. And it made me wonder to what extent was the Star Trek Control plot-lines a (Mockingbird) preconditioning? Anderson provides a wonderful counterpoint to the control fixation (psyop?) with the Moby Dick storyline of lack of control. And was that actually counterpoint, or a enforcement of the need for control?]
Steve wants names and he really wants to talk about Bill Gates.
Steve says Bill is really really really smart. Like, super smart. He’s brilliant. He’s a humanitarian. I mean look at what he’s doing for sanitation. He’s good. Why would he want to kill the world. Steve watched the Netflix Documentary and Bill is a really smart guy. Did you see the documentary? Also, Steve wrote a Substack about how Bill isn’t looking at the data. Steve has Bill’s personal email address.
Steve isn’t rendering an opinion, but he notes that there are other better ways to kill the world. Bill’s smart. He wouldn’t do it so slowly. Steve’s playing devil’s advocate. Bill is really smart. He would do it better. And Steve watched the Netflix documentary about him and he’s a good guy that does a lot of good in the world. Like look at the toilets and stuff.
Sasha easily sidesteps…I’m not interested in Bill Gates. I’m answering your question. However, Bill and Melinda Gates? They’ve invested in all of this - these injections.
And Steve, if not this way to depopulate, what would be a better way?
Steve: I know about stuff. Really really bad stuff. This would be terrible to tell people about. I just can’t talk about it. We can talk offline.
For her full review see Sarah’s “Question The Heroes: Stay On Your Toes, Friends.”
My Comment (slightly edited)
Hola Sarah. Great coverage and colour commentary too. Are you sure you aren't a sports newscaster in disguise, because you knocked this out of the park?! I confess that I became curious about the 'real' show after your summary, so I watched the whole thing and that reconfirmed how great you are at this. You really did catch the flavour of Steve well.
As I was watching Steve struggling to fix or correct the course of the narrative, it struck me that he is stuck in a kind of 14 year old teenage bubble of know-it-all-itis anxiously resting on an ignorance he doesn't want to acknowledge. (And Steve's need to show everyone the truth in his data in a kind of mock shock whiny-ish voice is in a similar cant. [Note: this is my observation and so is my opinion and open to being incorrect.] His fixation on Gates as a humble and kind supplier of shit(ters) making him the good man is a truly immature kind of petulant tantrum of denial. Sasha addressed that more gently than I would have, though. BTW, I loved loved Sasha here! She expressed rock hard strength and a very firm gentleness with Steve as innocent hurt child who still has not digested having been traumatised by his government acting as agents of death. [As I was putting this post together, I learned that Gates has been looking to revolutionise toilets. See Samsung and Gates. This is curious, as I remember composting toilets from 2010? Current versions are here.]
Back to evil Gates as philanthropic shit(ter) supplier. (The [interview’s] moderator's comment about that [philanthropic] mask being very likely a conditional generosity was subtle and beautiful.) Hollywood (Mockingbird) suggests that the devil will show itself as a scary obviously evil figure. [Headshake.] More preconditioning psyop? Really, who here thinks the devil is actually that stupid? The devil shows itself as what our ego wants to achieve and with sweet words and gentle nudges moves us away from the truth of our heart. The great movie "The Devil’s Advocate" shows that clearly and cleverly. Vanity, the devil says, still. my favourite. (Or something like that.)
How many times did Steve describe Gates as smart and aware of the data? Sorry, didn't think to count, I'm thinking close to ten times. So why isn't Gates expressing to Steve, via personal email, his horror at the data? Sorry, Steve, the answer is obvious and I could see you almost were willing to see it. Almost. Brainy-Gates can and is easily seeing that vaccines were the most profitable investment his non-profit investment invested in. (Well, he actually said that publicly that I saw.) And to me he is unquestionably seeing that the injections are making his evan-eugenical heart 1) Very happy with the results; 2) Moderately happy with the results or; 3) Unhappy with the results or ... What? That he may be discovered as the philanthropath that he actually is? (Hmmm, although that would imply a conscience that likely doesn't exist. Although a high functioning smart sociopath knows the overt niceties of life and effectively simulates conscience, so perhaps not.)
And, sorry Steve, why are you trusting something broadcast on Netflix? Big credibility drop there. (Sasha suggested that he think about how their PR people may have created the toilet king's film. Toilets, Steve, you really did say toilets more than five times to confirm and crown Gates to be a kind man? One who can/cannot see the golden truth in the overflowing toilet bowl?)
I came away from this thinking that Steve is less controlled opposition than a frightened teenager with Asperger's hoping that the narcissistic/sociopathic family he is a part of really isn't that bad. I think that may make him more a convenient dupe for the psyops [than a player]. Still dangerous, although maybe dangerous for his handlers because he may come unglued and behave unexpectedly in the future.
His fixation on 'data' is also a devil's tell because it is a fool's gold or paradise that more often blinds us than illuminates us. Is it useful? Yes, it is a tool, like all human tools, and is just as easily turned into a weapon as any knife or rifle, [that can hurt the incautious or ignorant users].
My basic take away from Sasha was that this has been a long long planned and very well executed genocide and that it is also at the same time a very long long experiment with multiple trials on how to do better genocide with improved injection technology and dosing. Steve's response to that was Gates is a supplier of shit(ters) and is very smart and death by injection is an inefficient way to kill people. (Efficiency is also an MBA-Milton [Friedman] school of mis-economics and one of this ideologies go-to rationales and greatest Achilles' tendons. It may actually be a part of the why current iteration of cabal-eugenicists have ‘accidentally’ exposed themselves: how to get to 2030 as efficiently as possible.) This almost childish rejection of Sasha's thesis really struck me with just how Steve's immaturity is keeping him from being willing to see these two points. Again, the almost tantrum-like who and why. Why did the scorpion kill the frog and down them both? Why do megalomaniac philanthropaths kill? Same. [Synchronicity: in the book I’m reading, Buddha or Bust: In Search of Truth, Meaning, Happiness, and the Man Who Found Them All, I was read in the previous day or two about the author’s encounter with Japanese Zen monk. The author asked the monk “Why do countries that are Buddhist have people who kill each other?” The monk’s answer: “A dog can only be a dog.”]
In response to Steve's question about why not just use flu vaccines and do it more slowly, Sasha addressed that with it having a high risk of getting caught. Yup, Gates [or was it the WHO under control of Gates?] was caught putting sterilising agents in vaccines [four times: Africa, India, Philippines, Mexico] that I'm aware of. However, I suspect that the rush is because MBA-like, the cabal have succumbed to their own lies and are committed to a 2030 reset project accomplishment date and are now panicked and so acting more overtly. Their hubris related plot blind spots are becoming evident. (I read an odd example of that idiocy with the EPA's announced plans to turn off the American electrical grid by 2030 and elsewhere I read the EPA director assuring the American public that by 2030 the military fleet with be 100% electrical! LOL!)
Ante-penultimately, maybe. Hello Steve. There are none so blind as those who wilfully do not see. And what we do not see within our selves, we project onto others. I agree with you that it is unlikely Gates is blind to the data. The question then is, who is blind to what? We have met the enemy and the enemy is us.
And Steve reminded me of some cautionary quotations I read many years ago:
1) What happens then, when we blur the distinction between ideas and information and teach children that information processing is the basis of thought? Or when we set about building an "information economy" which spends more and more of its resources accumulating and processing facts? For one thing, we bury even deeper the substructures of ideas on which information stands, placing them further from critical reflection. ... In the long run, no ideas, no information.
Roszak, Theodore. "Of Ideas and Data." In The Cult of Information: A Neo-Luddite Treatise on High-Tech, Artificial Intelligence, and the True Art of Thinking. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986, p. 106.
And:
But now, in this century of ideologies, the Gods and Destiny have been given new life. "Miracles in the world are many," Sophocles wrote in the fifth century BC. "There is no greater miracle than man." Suddenly, at the end of the twentieth century, we discover that no, after all, it isn't true. Historical inevitability is a greater miracle than man. As is the dialectic. As is the superiority of various groups according to blood type. As is the genius of an abstract mechanism called the market. As is the leadership of inanimate objects — called technology — which worker bees create and then, inevitably, are led by. These inevitabilities are great leaps backward into the arms of the Gods and Destiny.“ — John Ralston Saul, book The Unconscious Civilization (1995).
Click here for more great prescient JRS quotations.
Now for a closing musical theme:
Sarah’s Turn
… I wondered about Steve too...is he putting it on, or is he really that obtuse? I cannot imagine that it's the latter, but as I'm becoming very used to saying these days, stranger things have happened. Also, I had every intention of counting how many times he said bill gates or smart, but never ended up getting it done. It was remarkable though😳...
A friend texted last night and said that she can't wait to watch it and hear what was actually said. I told her that she might be surprised..it was relatively close to verbatim😅
Sarah Continues
[In a deleted comment someone asked me if] I had bothered to look at the VSRF [Vaccine Safety Research Foundation] page to see all of the good work that this organisation has done, like the Covid Litigation Conference. He then went on to say that if I was trying to undermine that work then I was doing a good job and I should add a gold star to my keyboard.
I didn't respond [at the time because I read it on a work break] and I've definitely found that it behooves me to think before I speak. I guess I closed the tab and now cannot locate the comment. That's ok, I don't need to respond....I did want to share it here because I think it was such a perfect example of the strategy that continues to play out.
He's right. I'm sure VSRF is doing lots of good; it certainly appears so on the website, which is full of legal information, health information, homeschool resources, there is support for the vaccine injured, etc. This is where it gets sticky - and hard to decipher who is playing what angle, and who is being played. Because, to Steve's wreck-it-ralph point, I think most are probably well intentioned. I don't think his pal Bill is one of these innocent do-gooders...but the argument he makes for Bill, I think could be made for many associated with VSRF. Which makes calling it out sticky without looking like an asshole. This is the same run it back strategy used everywhere. You can't say that you don't agree with the BLM [Black Lives Matter] movement because that means you're racist. You don't want your kids groomed by the trans movement, and you're transphobic. You can't point out that there might be underlying narratives playing out within the MFM [medical freedom movement] because now you're undermining the "movement".
I'm not arguing for a moment that good is not being done, and I don't even think I need to say that I am not intentionally trying to thwart good. But we are never getting off of this rinse and repeat ride if we don't start watching the operators. I mean, we are still taking our shoes off at the airport, 20 years later and pretending that makes sense!
It's early, and I didn't sleep well last night, so I'm not sure that I'm even making sense, but I guess the question that remains unanswered for me, is how much unawareness is reasonable to assume possible? Data, data, data; I want a smoking gun; Bill Gates is a good guy and too smart to do it this way...blah blah blah. I don't know.
Considering the undercurrent narrative, I was totally baffled at first as to why they would put Steve on cooling the marks by interviewing Sasha. This was a clear Steve-fail, before it even started...I knew Sasha would fillet him with ease and poise.
The more I thought about it, the more it was clear....of course they put the least capable with her. They can't have her slicing up their podium heroes on the main stage...and they also must be aware that the crickets are up to a low roar on the rather obvious absence of certain voices; ie Yeadon [Dr. Michael Yeadon], Sasha, and Watt [noted above in Bailiwick News Substack] on the interview circuit.
So does Steve know that he's the least capable and being paraded out to cool the marks, or is he playing the fool for the camera? I don't know, but I'm less and less inclined to give the benefit of the doubt these days.
All theory, of course...
I've rambled on longer than I should've and must run along to that pesky job of mine ;) ♥️
Guy
You have compassionately and eloquently described the Yogic/Buddhist idea of 'vidya', clear seeing. That can be translated also as discernment.
How do I know that what I am seeing is correct? And for now, that doesn't even mean 'good' or 'evil', which are stories that quickly and easily blind us to what is there and are a clear sign of poor quality seeing.
The question 'Is Steve 'good' or ‘a good guy' (aka 'hero') becomes pretty irrelevant, actually, when we develop our ability to discern our own and then his shadows' projection. W/he become human, neither victim nor hero.
That process, discernment of the other person's shadow does not even begin to happen until I take responsibility for discernment of my own shadow. I have met the enemy and the enemy is me. Period. My desire to create victims and heroes is MY shadow, a story in my unconscious looking for something tangible to hang on to. A story that creates 'camps' and 'movements' of ideology and delusion. Steve's 'Why?' is that shadow and he is immaturely unable to move his data story from a hat rack in a room of all good or all bad.
Is the VSRF doing great work? Very likely some of it is. Gandhi the peaceful warrior helped free India from British rule and helped set up the conditions of an internal religious 'war' that killed 200-500 thousand people. Hmmmm.
I also wrestle with everything being well planned by either the cabal or the counter-cabal. [Sidetrack:] Sorry, I don't like MFM as a description because even it is a delimiting catalogue. And I don't like counter-cabal either. What might be a good 'categorising' word-phrase that isn't creating a category or camp that can be vilified or glorified? I'll wrestle with how to express that with the idea of an appropriate response to the conditions of life that I am in, that are at this time. Perhaps the deepest expression is 'Tao' or 'Life' or maybe 'All That Is'. Hmmmm. There is the well planning and 'good' intentioned cabal who want to save the planet for themselves who are the good, the nice Gates who supplies, with conditions, toilets and while [maybe wondering about how to] privatise the water supply in the area, and there is the Tao that balances the unbalanced. Hmmmm. An idea in process. [End of sidetrack.]
I watched the MBAs [Masters of Business Administration] run amok in the company I worked at and execute their 'well thought out' (in other words disembodied woke economic and financial ideology) and elaborate plans. Certainly they worked to a certain, and perhaps even to a large degree in the short term. And yet in the end it was in limited ways on an off day. The mechanics of life are way too subtle to be captured by woke plans and at the same time the results of energetic coalescence is unpredictable for both the 'evil' planners and the 'good' resistors. Was Kirsch carefully put up as a sacrificial lamb by the cabal to reduce the damage to their reputation or was it the Universe asking Steve to wake up and free himself from his immature beliefs in 'goodness' and [the] ‘data-good [god’]? Was it Steve honourably wanting his audience to see a true warrior to help us wake up, or the Universe guiding him to that purpose regardless of the cabal's so-called 'real' plans? [Shrug.]
I'm basically aligned with Life and so am an optimist. Sacrificial lamb by the cabal, good intentioned boy-man hoping for a clean answer to confirm his meaning of life, carrier of a stop creating heroes message for those of us struggling to take ownership of our shadows or... Pollster-Steve-like, all of the above at the same time? I'm laughing as I write that because I see just how big the Universe's sense of humour is!
My very smart sister who has been watching this unfold for twenty years has a lot of experience with and many examples of how effective the counter operations are at destroying 'freedom movements'. So, our challenge, is to be not a movement. Not even anti-cabal, which is almost as limiting an idea. (The “Occupy Wall Street Event” was pretty close to a non-movement expression of freedom as we watched the media and politicians struggle to designate it as this or that by demanding from the occupiers their demands and hoping for violence.)
Our challenge is to observe our own shadow projections, expand consciousness and compassion. Voila. When done by enough of us 'true' freedom fighters, ie freeing ourselves from our own shadows, then the energy that is giving life to improved genocidal experiments will steadily drop away and die. Using 'good' insecticides to kill the evil-bugs creates better bugs. How to fight back without fighting? Gandhi is not a good example, for example.
All the best with our challenge, to discern our own shadows dancing in the slice and dice we see in things like the Steve and Sasha encounter.
Namaste. 🙏🧘🏿♀️❤️🙂
Sarah
Always enlightening, Guy. I also dislike the MFM name, but feel like ‘cabal’ is also thought limiting - particularly to those that would benefit most from hearing the words surrounding it.
Gandhi is such a good bad example of the dichotomy that seems inherent to humanity. As far as I can tell, this a human-specific issue, but perhaps I haven't thought through it all the way.
I'm almost wrapped up at the studio for the day, just need to pick up all the things strewn about. Then heading home to bounce the kiddos to the skatepark. I will re-read your thoughts with more focus later this afternoon, but I wanted to let you know that you are always welcome to use anything from our exchanges. I'm honoured to have our dialogue, and happy you find it as valuable as I do.
Namaste 🙏🏼
Hola, NOB.
You are finding your way into the main dance floor of Life!
Fantastic, now willing to stop being a wall flower or paper. ;-)
Write as freely as your fingers will allow and know you are engaging and stimulating me at the same time
Today is a bit busy so I will be terse as the less than terse Guy can be.
I gave my registrant a free marma as part of the retreat. It was great for him, another new experience to release stuck shit in the mind and body.
Great to see you dancing! Namaste.
💞🙏 Thank you for sharing this Guy and thank you for being you, for helping me.
Blessings, Love and Peace to You always