The anticipated and immediate hustling of the main character into a waiting getaway vehicle by the metro-entourage stagehands, along with the lightning bolt quick dismantling and removal of the stage props tells all non-captive audience members that the show was a show.
The government narrators deliver a rapidly issued story that obviously no one can believe while some audience plants have already sworn to the open chest wound story.
Now several threads can be endlessly argued in the social interwebs while the witness protection program allows the main characters to continue lucrative existence outside of the theater.
The anticipated and immediate hustling of the main character into a waiting getaway vehicle by the metro-entourage stagehands, along with the lightning bolt quick dismantling and removal of the stage props tells all non-captive audience members that the show was a show.
The government narrators deliver a rapidly issued story that obviously no one can believe while some audience plants have already sworn to the open chest wound story.
Now several threads can be endlessly argued in the social interwebs while the witness protection program allows the main characters to continue lucrative existence outside of the theater.
I hope I get this right.
Is it possible that you have missed writing in the plural:
'main characters'
---
I mean:
1. Guy Duperreault
2. Mrs Horsley
3. Mr Horsley
Wrong 3. Dave Bowie, Johnny Astin, and Ellvis
Wonderful writing!
The script was easy to read and the essay style also.
---
Just some odd notes:
True is true, typically within specified boundary conditions.
(what if the boundary conditions are universal?)
---
You mentioned in the article: Mind and Body.
My thought: Where is their boundary to the Heart?
---
Eurythmics - Douglas Gabriel claims that he met Annie Lennox somewhere (a book store?) before she became "Annie Lennox". Which leads me to Steiner.
If you have not read this article that Jasun shared, I can only say that it was well worth my time reading it. https://substack.com/@slyokka/note/c-297690084
---
Speaking of synchronicities:
The above mentioned article I printed on paper.
Finished reading it on the local café.
Met an older man that I recently have bumped into a couple of times at the café.
Gave him my two doubles of Monty Python's "The Meaning of Life" and "Life of Brian", which I said I would give him when/if we met again.
We talked about all the odd things that exist.
He was going on to maybe meet an American younger woman in town.
She had contacted him via Signal (?) and asked for his help.
She claimed that God had told her to do that.
He was very doubtful, but had listened to her story (since March this year).
And then he had understood between the lines that her 6-year-old daughter might be at risk.
Gave him the paper with the Steiner article. Very apt, but without any real answers.
Haven't met him after this yet.
To be continued.
---
Watched the INFJ video.
I recognized a lot of my behavioural patterns.
Have not done any Byer-Mriggs or IQ test and know nothing or little about it.
Reflection: If I claimed to be an INFJ also, would not that be very INFJ-unlike feature then?
I mean, wouldn't just a sudden shift of mood topple the whole model?