No one could accuse me of being a believer of false government stories generally … and I’m certainly willing to disbelieve even more narratives than I currently disbelieve. However, it is very obvious that the “moon landings hoax” narrative is a psyop.
Prominent moon hoaxers including Bill Kaysing, Dave McGowan, Massimo Mazzucco and Bart Sibrel have not uttered a single word in their books / films that refute the reality of the moon landings.
If astronauts really hadn’t landed on the moon why would they not say A SINGLE WORD that refutes their reality? How would that even be possible? We know that agents mix truth with lies but for an event that was faked why would they ONLY put forward false claims.
In the headlining image, mention is made of: shadows not being parallel; no stars showing and a lunar spotlight. All these seeming anomalies have been explained endlessly.
“American Moon was very very selective in choosing the pictures which show apparent falloff and completely ignoring the huge number which show the exact opposite. I think the apparent falloff could be explained by slopes in the moon's surface, but there is no way to explain the pictures that don't show falloff, unless they were taken on the moon.”
They started pushing out anti-moon landing propaganda BEFORE they even happened - in the 1968 30-min BBC drama, The News-Benders. That’s how much those in power want to target the disbelievers in order to control their minds too. They just luuurve to control the minds of the disbelievers as much as those of the believers … if not moreso.
perhaps one day we can talk about the double-bind (double-blind) false narratives. i'm certainly not an expert, although i've begun to understand — i think maybe, at least in a limited way on a good day — that any psyop begins with at least two and often several narrative threads. i'm now suspecting that at least sometimes the narrative thread has absolutely no validity in any direction!
this makes sense with the idea that the ultimate purpose of the bamboozlement is to weaken humans for 1) ease of captured enslavement and/or 2) population reduction, like culling the herd or clearing out the weeds in a garden.
i will consider your argument. it does face an uphill battle. for several reasons. some of them are technical. i've seen some of the arguments that are to prove the fakery wrong unconvincing. however, these are not my main or central criterion for distinguishing truth from fakery. at this time i attend to my body with an active psyche-somatic process that i complement with paying close attention to the synchronicities that come up around the time. in what direction are they pointing to support or refute my psyche-somatic awareness. for many reasons, not the least of which was that was the sole reason i refused the injection — that combination — has proven 100%.
my psyche-somatic experience and the extraordinary series of synchronicities immediately following it — amongst the most extraordinary i've experienced in a 30+ year concentrated practice of synchronicity vigilance — are firmly calmly asserting its fakery. the final evidence for me of the fakery has been the extraordinary change in my physical awareness and sense of aliveness and joy. and even, perhaps, by the extraordinary reduction of the sharp and chronic pain in my right hip that magically happened at the same time i was finishing the exploration.
we are living in extraordinary times! the great apocalypse, the bhagavad-gita!
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
"... it does face an uphill battle. for several reasons. some of them are technical. i've seen some of the arguments that are to prove the fakery wrong unconvincing."
No, Guy, there's no uphill battle. Reality has a signature which the moon landings display at every pore. People are misled into thinking that anything can be faked ... because they fake things all the time. Sure, they fake stuff all the time ... but they don't fake it without the fakery being detectable, the fakery is always detectable, especially, of course, because an essential element of psyops is Revelation of the Method ... the thing is though even if they tried to fake things as realistically as possible it's not possible with an event for which there is masses of purported evidence of the nature of the evidence we have for the moon landings, including 1,000 hours of conversation between the astronauts and mission control in the Apollo missions. You cannot fake 1,000 hours of conversation between 15 people to sound extempore rather than improvised or scripted.
again, an interesting argument that i will consider.
and, again, i appreciate your comments and critical eye and considerations. very important to keep us sharp and on our toes.
this narrative detection process is very very old. both gautama buddha and patañjali suggested that the most important and difficult part of discovering what is true or not is the concept of 'avidya', or the suffering caused by improper seeing — to mistake true with false, false with true and with neutral with non-neutral. with the great apocalypse in process, the depth of their insights about that have become something i see with more understanding and respect.
bueno!
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
I received the following comment as a dm. i asked the comment maker if it was okay to share and if so could i share it publicly or anonymously. i was given the dm okay to share and to keep it anonymous.
~~~~~~
Hello Guy, how are you? I liked the essay you just published.
What is interesting for us to understand is that lies are fed down 'both sides' from the big lie . Both in terminology and so called conspiracies ha ha. Often the same people start the conversations from the top and encourage the lie and the counter lie. So called 'truth' and 'conspiracy' language are then controlled by the same agents.
If you look into what happened in Stockholm to start the term Stockholm Syndrome you may see that is also a term used 'against' - in a weird mirror universe kind of way. Being the age we are we have lived our whole lives in a complex web of lies so that now we have very little chance of uncovering truth (without) which is exactly as it was intended.
Engaging in the world (people, society, making money, so called normality) becomes a new challenge every time we step outside of our own space doesn't it!
You are brave to try again and I wish you luck , although maybe you need only clarity. I am sure if you continue to listen to your own truth from within you will navigate a new path and I will watch your progress with interest.
I am not ready for this yet, I feel. I continue to brush the cobwebs from my face in shock and horror every time I take another look. The web of lies I believed 🤦 I am thankful to see and I would not change it even if I could but it still causes pain which is my reminder in itself. A bit like being kept awake with a little electric shock therapy ha ha.
my sister made that comment many years ago when i was at the very beginning of dipping my toes into narration-world. at the time i said i understood her — and i thought that i did and perhaps to a small extent i did. now that nascent understanding is fleshing itself out and i now trust that nothing is trustworthy. the whole world is a word-muddied babel as was/is the plan. confusion reigns everywhere.
this is where i have found yoga to be invaluable. from the skill of calming the fluctuations of the mind, i find i am (mostly) able to simply allow both narratives to be recognised as
*the* narrative. and that my calling them a narrative is to call them out! and that even that is a 'false' narrative! ahhhhhhh! relaxation! with that i have given my self the space to breathe, to sigh and to laugh, at times. yes, i do that even while truly recognising that we are being culled with absolute brutality beneath the gaslighting of science™ and medicine™ and morality™. the necromancing-narrative-masters honour and propagate their narratives as singular morality and truth whereas, as i continue my yoga experiential intensive, the core experience of being alive is joy once the terror and the lies are replaced with being 100% committed to being fully responsibly alive in life. we are the means, the energies to reduce suffering of self and others rather then increasing it. that is joyful! to see my own suffering being reduced day-by-day and for that to become an agent of reducing suffering in my community.
removing the lies, all lies, personal and social, from my body continues to prove itself. well, lol, we'll so how that ends up! oh! right. death. hmmmmm.
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
No one could accuse me of being a believer of false government stories generally … and I’m certainly willing to disbelieve even more narratives than I currently disbelieve. However, it is very obvious that the “moon landings hoax” narrative is a psyop.
Prominent moon hoaxers including Bill Kaysing, Dave McGowan, Massimo Mazzucco and Bart Sibrel have not uttered a single word in their books / films that refute the reality of the moon landings.
If astronauts really hadn’t landed on the moon why would they not say A SINGLE WORD that refutes their reality? How would that even be possible? We know that agents mix truth with lies but for an event that was faked why would they ONLY put forward false claims.
In the headlining image, mention is made of: shadows not being parallel; no stars showing and a lunar spotlight. All these seeming anomalies have been explained endlessly.
Why no stars - https://www.discovery.com/science/apollo-50th-anniversary/why-aren-t-there-stars-in-the-moon-landing-photos-
Why shadows don’t appear parallel - https://www.spacecentre.nz/resources/faq/spaceflight/moon-hoax/shadows-parallel.html
Seeming spotlight -
https://www.reddit.com/r/SensibleSite/comments/eqfeqs/comment/fsi5wky/
“American Moon was very very selective in choosing the pictures which show apparent falloff and completely ignoring the huge number which show the exact opposite. I think the apparent falloff could be explained by slopes in the moon's surface, but there is no way to explain the pictures that don't show falloff, unless they were taken on the moon.”
https://www.reddit.com/r/SensibleSite/comments/eduyu3/evidence_for_the_moon_landings/
My page with links to other pages exposing the psyop that is the “moon landings hoax”.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/moon-landings-hoax-psyop
What really takes the cake?
They started pushing out anti-moon landing propaganda BEFORE they even happened - in the 1968 30-min BBC drama, The News-Benders. That’s how much those in power want to target the disbelievers in order to control their minds too. They just luuurve to control the minds of the disbelievers as much as those of the believers … if not moreso.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/priming-the-disbelievers-the-moon
interesting reply!
perhaps one day we can talk about the double-bind (double-blind) false narratives. i'm certainly not an expert, although i've begun to understand — i think maybe, at least in a limited way on a good day — that any psyop begins with at least two and often several narrative threads. i'm now suspecting that at least sometimes the narrative thread has absolutely no validity in any direction!
this makes sense with the idea that the ultimate purpose of the bamboozlement is to weaken humans for 1) ease of captured enslavement and/or 2) population reduction, like culling the herd or clearing out the weeds in a garden.
i will consider your argument. it does face an uphill battle. for several reasons. some of them are technical. i've seen some of the arguments that are to prove the fakery wrong unconvincing. however, these are not my main or central criterion for distinguishing truth from fakery. at this time i attend to my body with an active psyche-somatic process that i complement with paying close attention to the synchronicities that come up around the time. in what direction are they pointing to support or refute my psyche-somatic awareness. for many reasons, not the least of which was that was the sole reason i refused the injection — that combination — has proven 100%.
my psyche-somatic experience and the extraordinary series of synchronicities immediately following it — amongst the most extraordinary i've experienced in a 30+ year concentrated practice of synchronicity vigilance — are firmly calmly asserting its fakery. the final evidence for me of the fakery has been the extraordinary change in my physical awareness and sense of aliveness and joy. and even, perhaps, by the extraordinary reduction of the sharp and chronic pain in my right hip that magically happened at the same time i was finishing the exploration.
we are living in extraordinary times! the great apocalypse, the bhagavad-gita!
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
🙏❤️🧘♂️🙌☯️🙌🧘♂️❤️🙏
"... it does face an uphill battle. for several reasons. some of them are technical. i've seen some of the arguments that are to prove the fakery wrong unconvincing."
No, Guy, there's no uphill battle. Reality has a signature which the moon landings display at every pore. People are misled into thinking that anything can be faked ... because they fake things all the time. Sure, they fake stuff all the time ... but they don't fake it without the fakery being detectable, the fakery is always detectable, especially, of course, because an essential element of psyops is Revelation of the Method ... the thing is though even if they tried to fake things as realistically as possible it's not possible with an event for which there is masses of purported evidence of the nature of the evidence we have for the moon landings, including 1,000 hours of conversation between the astronauts and mission control in the Apollo missions. You cannot fake 1,000 hours of conversation between 15 people to sound extempore rather than improvised or scripted.
hola, petra.
again, an interesting argument that i will consider.
and, again, i appreciate your comments and critical eye and considerations. very important to keep us sharp and on our toes.
this narrative detection process is very very old. both gautama buddha and patañjali suggested that the most important and difficult part of discovering what is true or not is the concept of 'avidya', or the suffering caused by improper seeing — to mistake true with false, false with true and with neutral with non-neutral. with the great apocalypse in process, the depth of their insights about that have become something i see with more understanding and respect.
bueno!
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
🙏❤️🧘♂️🙌☯️🙌🧘♂️❤️🙏
I received the following comment as a dm. i asked the comment maker if it was okay to share and if so could i share it publicly or anonymously. i was given the dm okay to share and to keep it anonymous.
~~~~~~
Hello Guy, how are you? I liked the essay you just published.
What is interesting for us to understand is that lies are fed down 'both sides' from the big lie . Both in terminology and so called conspiracies ha ha. Often the same people start the conversations from the top and encourage the lie and the counter lie. So called 'truth' and 'conspiracy' language are then controlled by the same agents.
If you look into what happened in Stockholm to start the term Stockholm Syndrome you may see that is also a term used 'against' - in a weird mirror universe kind of way. Being the age we are we have lived our whole lives in a complex web of lies so that now we have very little chance of uncovering truth (without) which is exactly as it was intended.
Engaging in the world (people, society, making money, so called normality) becomes a new challenge every time we step outside of our own space doesn't it!
You are brave to try again and I wish you luck , although maybe you need only clarity. I am sure if you continue to listen to your own truth from within you will navigate a new path and I will watch your progress with interest.
I am not ready for this yet, I feel. I continue to brush the cobwebs from my face in shock and horror every time I take another look. The web of lies I believed 🤦 I am thankful to see and I would not change it even if I could but it still causes pain which is my reminder in itself. A bit like being kept awake with a little electric shock therapy ha ha.
Much love to you. Courage xx ❤️
hola, anonymous. i agree.
my sister made that comment many years ago when i was at the very beginning of dipping my toes into narration-world. at the time i said i understood her — and i thought that i did and perhaps to a small extent i did. now that nascent understanding is fleshing itself out and i now trust that nothing is trustworthy. the whole world is a word-muddied babel as was/is the plan. confusion reigns everywhere.
this is where i have found yoga to be invaluable. from the skill of calming the fluctuations of the mind, i find i am (mostly) able to simply allow both narratives to be recognised as
*the* narrative. and that my calling them a narrative is to call them out! and that even that is a 'false' narrative! ahhhhhhh! relaxation! with that i have given my self the space to breathe, to sigh and to laugh, at times. yes, i do that even while truly recognising that we are being culled with absolute brutality beneath the gaslighting of science™ and medicine™ and morality™. the necromancing-narrative-masters honour and propagate their narratives as singular morality and truth whereas, as i continue my yoga experiential intensive, the core experience of being alive is joy once the terror and the lies are replaced with being 100% committed to being fully responsibly alive in life. we are the means, the energies to reduce suffering of self and others rather then increasing it. that is joyful! to see my own suffering being reduced day-by-day and for that to become an agent of reducing suffering in my community.
removing the lies, all lies, personal and social, from my body continues to prove itself. well, lol, we'll so how that ends up! oh! right. death. hmmmmm.
all the best with what has changed in 2024! and with everything that is to change in 2025! everything changes! with peace, respect, love and exuberant joy.
🙏❤️🧘♂️🙌☯️🙌🧘♂️❤️🙏