It's Been a While. Where Have I Been?

September 2025: Yogic Life Update with ClearVision Eye-Kriya and I Introduced My Self to Feminism And Am Surprised to Discover it to be Evil Incarnate

Sep 16, 2025

varios murales de oaxaca. musica: eurythmics: would i lie to you?

Introduction: With Eyes Returning to See, This Yogic Mind-Body Healing Continues my Spiritual Journey

Hello human! Without intention or thought that I would drop into a substack verbal hiatus of several months, that was exactly what happened. Why?

If you prefer to watch a video:

If you prefer video:

It's Been a While. Where Have I Been? — Video

Guy Duperreault

Sep 16

Read full story

Or if you prefer to listen to audio:
(note: I was unable to launch my sound editor, and it has a rough beginning. Skip forward to 0:45 to avoid. Or listen to me fumbling around a little.)

It really began when I started the ClearSight all natural (and spiritual) ‘method’ of healing my eyes from eye-glass dependency. That process became, ultimately, the continuation of my ‘spiritual’ yogic journey into seeing the truth more clearly because healing my eyes really only began after I had removed the psyche-spiritual blinders that I had built to protect my Self from a past act. My act, my action, my responsibility.

When I was twelve I had betrayed that Self of mine to a best friend’s exhortations to share a blood oath of cut-palms with spit and fire. It was a sacred blood oath to the death to shun girls for life. I knew at the time, in heart, that that oath had betrayed the truth of my spirit/soul, my anima. And on hindsight I see, now, that I was so disgusted at this extreme bloody betrayal of my anima that my eyes quickly stopped seeing it and within a few months I couldn’t read the blackboard and was given eye-glasses to compensate.

At the age of twelve, I was unwilling, perhaps unable, to handle the truth of the extent to which I could and did betray my Self. I could, because I did, betray my Soul, even with my having felt the truth that I was in the act of creating that betrayal with a boy’s blood and spit oath — and continued on to kill it, kill me.

And a few months after each eye-glass ‘fix’ I would notice that life got blurrier again. For a few years I was getting new eye-glasses about once every 18 months or so until I was twenty-ish. After that the degradation of sight continued at a slower pace, with the last new prescription happening near my 60th birthday four years ago.

🙏 If this essay gives you some pleasure, and/or an ‘aha’, extend our human intimacy and become a paid subscriber.

Or click on the coffee if you would like to buy me a coffee:

All the best with what is changing. Everything changes. Peace, respect, love and exuberant joy. 🙏

Essay Playlists:

Spotify

YouTube Talk

YouTube Music

The day after I saw that emotional block, that I had knowingly betrayed my Self so many years prior, I experienced a huge relief that expressed itself as five consecutive days of diarrhoea. And, as if by magic, a month later I was down four diopters with two more to go. Now I wear a borrowed pair of glasses only to read the computer. The last two diopters have been a very slow and steady yogic-work-in-process that involves a two hour eye-centric yogic-kriya practice that includes pranayama (breath work), mantra, sun-gazing, eye-palming and sometimes a ninety minute yin-yoga posture sequence.

So that has taken a big bite out of my substack writing time. And so, combined with the idea of not wearing eye-glasses in order to exercise the restorative practices for my eyes, I have been less active on the pc.

I discussed the eye-thing in detail in my penultimate post. That includes my being triggered by a woman telling her friends that she was disappointed that the convid plandemic hadn’t killed enough people, and that she hoped the next one would do a better job of it. That trigger was the key that opened my mind to my self-disgust. See,

Righteous Disgust! What’s in the Air Down Here?

Guy Duperreault

Mar 20

Read full story

How to Mine the Mine and the Not Mine of My Own Disgust Inside and Out

And I am excited that my eye-kriya practice has become one that eased a huge amount of tension out of this body and precipitated other significant physical and energetic changes beyond just my improved eyesight and vision.

To see well is to relax the eyes. To relax the eyes is to relax the body. To relax the body is to calm the mind.

Yoga is the promotion of relaxedness by calming the fluctuations of the mind. The mind calms, I now more clearly see, when our unseen internalised cultural mandated lies are seen and with becoming seen are released from the mind-body-spirit continuum. I suspect that all anxiety arises from being in some kind of unseen and/or unacknowledged lived lie, big or small.

Is anxiety simply a symptom of being separate from soul-body because we have been bullied by culture to believe things that are not true?

All this ‘stuff’ has loosened my spine and given it space to become straight. I sit and walk straighter than ever, and I am no longer a hunched over human-like creature. Maybe before the end of the month I will be 100% eye-glass free with a completely straight back. Okay, likely not like a ballet dancer’s back! And yet the feeling of spinal spaciousness is a true delight and now I can bend sideways and, for the first time in my life, delightfully crack my spine at the exact spot that, whenever I sat for still meditation, had initiated burning discomfort between the shoulder blades. Oh frabjous day, callooh callay! The truth is here to stay the fluctuations of the mind away!

My last full post was way back in April, another deep dive into the house of lies our society has been built on. This time in the guise of New Age a form of denialism of life as it is. In The Disharmony of the Four Agreements I dug into the extreme hypocrisy I read in that huge bestselling ‘spiritual’ self-help book by Don Miguel Ruiz, The Four Agreements: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom. I argue that its hypocrisy gives a feel-good hit of the appearance of personal empowerment and responsibility, a whiff of the potential to be personally free, while concomitantly offering a back door out to enable deferring actually doing the four ‘spiritual’ self-help practices. It is a near perfect manual that advocates spiritual truth on the one hand while authorising, with the extenisve use of lying bully language the importance of not doing them in order to be in actually alignment with truth. The book, as written, presents itself in such a way that to actually align with personal empowerment, truth is to not do the practices. It’s a bit subtle. And therefore, I realise, it is part of an important ingrained language-lie to unpack.

With seeing deeply into the heart of that book as being fundamentally false, I took another step into freedom from yet another of the schismogenetic societal lies that hurts intimacy with Self and others by energising anxiety.

Other Stuff that Kept Me From Writing: Pain, Eye Yama-Yoga, and I Become My Own ‘Professional’ Self-Proclaimed Yama-Yoga Instructor

Pain! OMG!

The last few months have been a pain fest of knife-like jabs all around my right hip, with frequent spells of burning pain above my right ankle and breath-stealing flashes down my inner thigh that would partially buckle my leg. Up until the last few weeks, the discomfort was particularly brutal. And, new to me, the discomfort began to include morning lower back pain that would pass by mid or late morning. More troubling was that I was feeling unstable. I no longer trusted that my right leg would be able to keep me from falling.

Walking had become an energetic push through thick water or a hard to touch molasses-like inertia. The twenty minute walk up the dirt mountain road was particularly egregious. I often arrived home thinking I couldn’t take another step because of pain and that odd heavy inertia. I would be drenched in sweat and felt exhausted. My once normal four to six hours of sleep often expanded to be more than eight and sometimes up to ten or more.

Fortunately the pain kept moving from one area of the hip to another, which I consider a good sign because its source likely is not physical. And that it is a psyche-energy block to something that my psyche is struggling to clear, that some part of me is blocking the truth of a falsehood that I hold as an invisible truth. Or perhaps as a denial of truth in some way. Further to that is that this or that pain was more or less uncomfortable on any given day, almost nothing some days, or at different times during a day.

Socialising?! Really?

And my body system has directed me to be more interactive with people, both on line and in person. So I have found myself traveling several hours a week to go into the city and encounter incredible people as directed by body-guided synchronicity. And by this muscle guided synchronicity-process I discovered a powerful Méxicana healer and her fascinating awake husband; and an excellent osteopath who plays the didjeridoo that his wife made. Both have helped me enormously.

Professional (Yama)-Yoga ‘Teacher’.

And now I teach my version of yama, niyama, klesha focused yoga at a delightful eco-friendly downtown hotel. And that has extended to me more encounters with incredible people, mostly from Europe and the USA. For now.

A Few Begun and Nary A One Finished; Y Me Gusta Mucho Español

Since then I have begun and have begun-to-finish several essays. All of which are in varying states of incompleteness. I have been reasonably consistent in commenting in other peoples’ substacks and lazily ‘note-ifing’ the more interesting comments. Although even the scope of my reading practices in substack and elsewhere, and with physical books, has been significantly reduced because I have displaced reading English stuff in order to accelerate learning Spanish.

I have advanced to where I am reading out loud Cien Años de Soledad by Gabriel García Márquez at the same time that I listen to its audiolibro.

A favourite book of many years ago! Now reading in Spanish. Music: Shakira — Antologia.

I find this to be a fun and powerful learning technique that has echos of being read to as a child. And like that child, week-by-week, my pronunciation, speed — Spanish is spoken about 30% faster than English — and comprehension improve. Now, when I talk with the expanding Spanish I have, Spanish listeners mostly understand me. 😳🙂 And, wonderfully, I them! I have enough Español now that, even with my crude grammar, I have successfully taught yoga in Español. Danza Snoopy! Snoopy Dance!

“Yoga is Cultural Mis-Appropriation!” Her Short, Sharp Retort Shut Me Down as a White Beta Male Less-Than Privileged Gringo Supremacist, Victimised by ‘Colonial Capitalism’ and for Being too Stupid, as a Typical Male, to Know It

I laughed out loud at her assured vehemence. It was flush with the self-righteous contempt and moral anger that comes only from the true activist ideologue: that deaf, dumb and blind child loudly do-gooding ‘moral truth’ who has absolute contempt for everyone outside his/her narrated victimised group as an irrelevant and possibly dangerous ignoramus.

After I recovered from my laughter, I proceeded to gently put into the air words that might avoid triggering from her another paroxysm of lunacy. Somehow, even from our relatively short ~~conversation~~ carefully curated and polite exchange of words, her arrogance and passive aggressive misandry slapped me into curiosity. Who was she, really? She spoke with skill and surety and the stupidity I’ve seen rarely except in graduates of university ~~studies~~ marxist ideological propaganda. I refrained from commenting on her many culturally misappropriated tattoos and managed to avoid triggering her before I left with my dates and nuts and piqued curiosity.

With The Innocence Of A Lamb To The Slaughter I Entered, With Open-Eyed Naïveté, The Book of the Unequivocal Vicious Pernicious Misandrist And Family-Destroying Malevolence that is Feminism: It Ain’t Pretty, It Just Looked that Way!

That oral ‘assault’ was a metaphorical ‘face-slap’ that had sparked my curiosity. I began to look, somewhat innocently, into feminism. Yeah, I have thought that it looked a bit deranged and demented, especially in recent times. And I have cursorily wondered, from time-to-time, how had it become so stupid. Perhaps, to laugh myself into conspiracy theory world squared, its ostensible stupidity has been a trick to hide how effective its malevolence has been. Although, now that I have started to attend social media as never before, I see a plethora of women — supposedly — crying out of both sides of their mouths: ‘All men are nothing more than useless rapists in potentia and it is best to reduce their numbers!’ ‘Where are all the ‘good’ men?!’ ‘Don’t you dare look at me you misogynist creep or I will charge you with sexual assault and shame you on Tik-Tok!’ ‘Why won’t any ‘good’ men try to talk to me, let alone even look at me anymore!?’ The Reason Men Aren’t Approaching Women Is…Women? Amala Ekpunobi, 21 Jul 2025.

What I discovered was the misandry, and absolute malevolence of feminism as an epitome of marxism: from its inception in the 1800s, not in a recent ‘wave’. One female anti-feminist has even stated, bluntly, there haven’t been waves. That it has been one long misandrist wave, now a tsunami. (My paraphrase from memory.)

It is clear to me, now, that feminism is marxism’s most successful manifestation in the west. Seemingly Time Magazine recognised that reality too, without openly denouncing it as a social threat. In 1970 after the publication of Kate Millet’s book, Sexual Politics, Millet was covered and they wrote of it and her:

In a way, the book has made Millett the Mao Tse-tung of Women’s Liberation (Nation: Who’s Come a Long Way, Baby? Time Magazine, August 31, 1970.)

The ‘cultural’ stuff that I had investigated across forty plus years as being really bad — medical science™, the religion of debt-economics, media mendacity and propaganda, oligarchic-corporatism, the business-cancer of MBAs as hiding-in-the-open communism, and even religion — haven’t been as effective at destroying the family unit and creating social confusion, chaos and decay than has feminism. Yes, the other stuff has certainly killed more people with managed wars and deliberate economic deprivations than has feminism: but those actions were actually well organised destruction and not the chaotic dysfunction in thinking and in misperceiving reality that feminism has created to destroy the sanctity and structure of the family — and church. And especially the family as guardians to safeguard the future generations of children. Feminism attacks the family from within: the others’ attacks were and are against the family as a whole, and often, not always, strengthened it as a unit against those overt and covert attacks.

What do I mean?

Many argue, such as Angela Stanton-King (see below), that feminism has been the direct cause of the death of millions with its advocacy of abortion. There has been a recent upsurge in the ‘right’ for women to choose to abort full term babies, as if calling it an abortion is not killing a life. And in increasing numbers, this ‘right’ has expanded across the ‘developed’ countries in the name of freedom from sexual responsibility and freedom from family obligation. How feminists call this an example of ‘equality’ and or ‘sexual freedom’ is an abuse of language beyond being asinine. For example:

0:38 So, one thing that's been on my mind recently … is what actually is the point of feminism? So I know we spend a lot of time, you know, debunking the lunacy of feminism, and we often hear a lot of commentators debunking … what feminism stands for. So I think we all know and agree that everything that feminism claims to stand for is just ridiculous, right?
But my question is to the feminists, what do you want? Seriously. I genuinely want an actual answer. The answer that I often hear from feminists is we want equality. Well, if you want equality, that means being treated the same as men. Which means the whole me-too movement would be void because, well, if women can't be coerced in the same way that men by law can't be coerced, then all of that would disappear. We want equality. Okay. Well, if you hit a man, expect to get hit back. We want equality. Okay. Okay. Well, in the family court systems, don't expect to instantly get custody of a child and instantly get the house. And in divorce courts, instantly get half of a man's wealth. We want equality.
…
15:20 [Margaret Sanger] was affiliated with [the Nazis] and she believed in eugenics, which is essentially … [when one group of people believe that they are the superior race and so] have a [moral] duty to exterminate the other [inferior one. A Nazi eugenicist, Margaret Sanger, is the feminist who ‘birthed’] Planned Parenthood. That's what all these feminists are fighting for. You know, the right to abortion. … that's where the inception of it all came from.
This lady said, and I quote,
"The kindest thing you can do to a child is kill it."
End quote. You can look this up. Just look up Margaret Sanger quotes. You will find some absolutely atrocious things there.
One thing that I find really interesting is that one of her big things was to introduce abortion to the black population in order to reduce it. Now, last time I checked … black women were one of the top, if not the top, group of women receiving this ‘healthcare’.
So, it worked. It [feminism] worked. (How I REALISED Men Were RIGHT All Along Christine Grace Smith. 5 Sept 2025. My emphasis and slight edits for clarity.)

Later in the video Smith cites Mallory Millet’s shocking discovery of the rationale of NOW, the National Organisation of Women. And Smith acknowledges, with some rueful respect, that the feminists of NOW have achieved their specific goal: cultural reformation by having destroyed the traditional family unit. And that that success was with having successfully destroyed the value of men. Mallory Millet is the sister of Kate Millet, author of Sexual Politics, introduced above. Kate Millet is one of the most revered of the ‘second wave’ misandrist angry feminists and was a co-founder of NOW. She was also a key architect of inserting misandrist feminism into academia.

17:44 … What are we [NOW] standing for? We are standing for the destruction of men, the destruction of patriarchy. We're standing for the destruction of the nuclear family.
And they proposed how they were going to do this. They had a whole plan. This is what I respect. At least these feminists knew what they stood for. They were explicit about it.
What's the plan? Well, we're going to promote promiscuity. We're going to tell women it's good to be promiscuous. And we're going to promote homosexuality [and all other forms of debased sexual expression, taking as a model, the Marquis de Sade].
Open your eyes. Look at the world. This all happened. What Margaret Sanger wanted with Planned Parenthood. It's all happening. Here in the UK. We've just passed a law for assisted dying. Abortion is now legal in the UK up until birth. It's all happening. These crazy women were allowed power and now the world is crumbling (How I REALISED Men Were RIGHT All Along Christine Grace Smith. 5 Sept 2025.)

In her short review of Sanger’s Planned Parenthood, Smith didn’t include that Sanger was an active Malthusian, someone who believes that overpopulation is a serious problem and that controlling population growth for eugenical race purification was of paramount importance. And that she was supported by the Rockefellers.

Sanger was willing to employ eugenicist and neo-Malthusian justifications for birth control because she believed that aside from the benefit it would provide to women, birth control [including abortion] would build stronger generations of children and would help insure the physical, economic, and political health of a society.
Sanger had participated in the 5th International Neo-Malthusian conference in London in 1922 and organised the 6th Conference in 1925. … With funds donated by her husband J. Noah Slee and other supporters, as well as a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, Sanger spent close to a year organising a World Population Conference to be held in Geneva, Switzerland on August 31-September 2, 1927 (my emphasis. Newsletter #8 (Spring 1994): From Geneva to Cairo: Margaret Sanger and the First World Population Conference.)

Note how this pro-feminist piece couched ‘eugenics’ as ‘building stronger generations of children’ by, effectively, weeding out the undesirable undeserving lesser-thans, and so Sanger’s focus was to abort the black communities.

And on the intention of the feminists of NOW, read The Intellectual Service of the Marxist Feminists of the 1960s: Identifying the Core, by By Pat Fagan, May 11, 2019.

As I have said many times, Mallory Millett’s 2014 essay “Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives” is the most important reportage of the 20th century because it leaves for history an insider’s view of the work that is by now well on its way to bringing down Western Civilisation. These highly intelligent and highly educated women were hellbent on completing Marx and Engle’s work by doing what so many (Lenin and Stalin included) could not do: destroy the family and religion, the two biggest obstacles to international materialist socialism. These women burrowed deep to find the ‘epicentre’ of society’s functioning and found it in the marital/sexual act of intercourse, where new life and the next generation of a society begins. (My emphasis).

How? This is well described in My Sister Kate: The Destructive Feminist Legacy of Kate Millett by Mallory Millet, 2022. Originally published in Frontpage in 2014.

One of their most desired results was the smashing of every taboo in Western culture. Imagine that! Think of that alone! The normalising of every taboo: polygamy, bestiality, Satanism, pornography, promiscuity, witchcraft, paedophilia – all activities which rot the human soul and city. Nothing burns down a society with such dispatch and totality as the unleashing of taboos. (My emphasis.)

That was focusing the intention. What was the plan? Read, Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives by Mallory Millet, September 1, 2014.

The horror I witnessed inside the women’s “liberation” movement.
…
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organisation of Women.

I now think that feminism’s great success is that it cleverly weaponised some of the those specific, natural, and distinct characteristics that fundamentally differentiate men and women — against each other. In effect, a gendered Mexican standoff. What I hadn’t seen was that it is currently the most powerful agent of societal destruction: feminism has most significantly, albeit not solely, advocated for ideological based denials of natural male/female differences while promoting its most dissolute behaviours as freedom and equality. For example, the need(?!?) to ask ‘What is a woman?’ is a direct consequence of the deliberate making of social and mental chaos by feminist ideology. As Smith said, objective, plan, action and success: mental confusion if not insanity leading to incoherence and the family bombed out of existence. ‘Official Trailer: "What Is A Woman?"‘ Matt Walsh, 14 May 2022.

Following the Rabbit in the Pink Tutu I Plunge Into the Deep Foul Fell of Feminism and Discover Misandrist Noxious Societal Poison, Not Gender Equality

Feminists — male and female — have successfully gaslit most western societies, especially in academia. As mentioned, prominent feminist Kate Millet was the driving person who spear-headed the creation and spread of women’s studies in universities as anti-family ideology indoctrination practices. And out from their university departments feminism expanded into government, the legal system, health, and corporatism by lying about their real intentions and flipping the meaning of words, as all ‘good’ marxists are taught to do. Nice catch phrases about the good of equality and equal pay and the evil of patriarchy and bank accounts and voting and freedom to work and free to be promiscuous — not whores — and free to abort in order to augment that ‘free’ sex expression and to work outside the home, and in porn sites — not voyeurism or prostitution but entrepreneurship, etc.

And they were able to leverage the appearance of their ‘moral goodness’ by promoting themselves as victims to male tyranny and barbarism. They were so effective that even questioning feminism, let alone criticising it, triggers from all these NOW feminist institutions a mockingbird co-ordinated narcissist-like media full press life-destroying public cancellation for misogyny and for defending rape-culture. Thus we see, in social media today, live-action harpy-like feminist tyrants having significantly crippled a significant area of free speech by frightening enough powerful people, men and women, including judges, into arguing that women can be men, men can be women and women never lie — because, well, why would they lie? And feminism has successfully infected the mind with a mental virus that even sex is an optional assignment because there are scores of genders, an imagined buffet of interchangeable body parts that gives each victim or victim-wannabe the choice of which victim gender does he or she want to be on any given day.

Feminism is a 100% rejection-of-truth mind-virus. It began that way, which I touch on briefly later in this essay. However, the measure of that virus’s success is seen in the current level of social chaos and dysfunction — exactly what all narcissistic relationships create. And like the ‘good’ narcissist, when feminists are pointed to this disordered state with facts, data, and anecdotes they either deny it, deflect from it, praise it as being a good, attack the messenger for their ‘tone’ and/or lie. For feminists, today’s lies are to be tomorrow’s post destruction utopian truths. Why observe measurable facts when they can be denied or reframed as feminist positives? And to paraphrase George Orwell from 1984, women are the men they fear and hate, and men are the new women who can give birth and lactate, or anything else our ideology affirms. See as an example: Matt Walsh Revisits His ‘What Is A Woman?’ Interview With Dr. Forcier, 3 Jun 2022:

Or this feminist who concludes that, since child health outcomes are measurably poorer in single mother families than those of single father families, ‘It is a net social benefit to have children suffer more in single mother homes because the traumatised children of single mothers will be stronger after recovering from that familial trauma than those poor children who were less traumatised in single father homes. Therefore, this is not a negative outcome as a consequence of feminism. It is a net good.’ My paraphrase. Andrew Wilson EDUCATES Feminist Degen until She SPAGS. Christine Grace Smith, 5 Jul 2024.

Once I opened my eyes I see pretty much everywhere feminists, male and female, denying the measurable indubitable evidence of that chaos displaying itself in expanding dysfunction in all family dynamics; growth in depression and associated palliative drugs, including excessive and inappropriate sex; rising rates of the other obvious addictive behaviours; decreasing rates of happiness; exploding rates of abortions and STDs; increased criminality and mental disorders in children; a significant jump and steady increase in rates of suicide attempts and successes, especially with men.

While correlation doesn’t necessarily equal causation — how long can the feminist gaslighters continue to flog that dead horse?! — these changes began to be measured shortly after women were ‘liberated’ from birth and the kitchen to freely ‘masculate’ or ‘manify’ themselves into their perverted ideas of men as promiscuous idiots and to join the work force as morally superior and better men boss-babes than the men they love to hate and want removed from the planet. A ‘typical’ example of the anti-male rhetoric profuse in society — academia, science reviews as well as social media — is Women Don’t Need Men! Human Enrich, 20 Feb 2023. Curious she cites herself as being Human Enrich, as a true feminist, calls for the elimination of men, not sexual ‘equality’ — whatever ‘equality’ means between two distinct human beings.

More Orwell, my paraphrase, on what has been successfully sold by feminism:

that for women the slavery of work outside the home is freedom, and that the power of womanhood in the home is slavery.

This next video comes with a disclaimer: Tracy Harmoush is talking with the infamous, pilloried and much attacked Andrew Tate about the super power of women. Note that that does not include being kick-ass women killing men on tv or in movies or boss-babes killing it (and the men) in the boardroom. "Everything Is My Fault" — Andrew Tate on Masculinity, Politics, Family, Allegations & The Matrix. Tracy Harmoush: What They Don't Tell Us Podcast. 22 May 2025.

And feminists, perhaps more in the female version than in the male one, absolutely do not see they have an insane ideology that might actually be melting their brains: on the one side they actively openly promote misandry and demand that they are at the very least equal to the men they love to hate.

Music: David Byrne — She Explains Everything to Me.

Although, not so secretly they, don’t actually believe in equality because of their sense of moral superiority to men, and so the debasing of men is what is actually required to create so-called equality: lessen the men in quantity and manhood.

Feminists Unite! Let’s Just Kill 90% of Those Useless and Debased Men Instead of Just Righteously Hating Them With the Sound Morality and Logic of the Innate Goodness of Being a Feminist Justifiably Ignoring and Publicly Castigating the Deluded Internalised Misogynists.

The late ‘60s and then the ‘70s, saw the pill and the expanded legalisation of abortion ‘rights’. These gave women equal access to sexual freedom and promiscuity with less consequence and responsibility so, of course, they were and are hailed as milestones in securing female freedom, if not complete equality — yet. This freedom was quickly augmented by the explosion of academic feminism and with it the self-created narcissistic ‘moral authority’ to claw from the ‘patriarchy’ more freedom. And with that change feminism gains this socially recognised educational platform and the respect that women ‘deserve’. And from that position of academic authority, PhD feminists and their graduate students began to openly, publicly, and in academic texts, avow the inutility of men as being solely power obsessed misogynist slaving rapists who have for millennia enslaved women. Naturally, such moral bankruptcy and human degeneracy provides the logical moral argument that warrants hatred towards men as morally correct. For example:

“women have a right to hate men: sorry, y’all, misandry is justifiable” by Anthony James Williams, Ph.D. Dec 30, 2016.

Interestingly enough this is not an atypical example of feminism’s open misandry, even by male feminists. Both sexes of academic feminism are openly comfortable with publishing as respectable ‘feminist’ science™ that misandry is morally correct.

Not infrequently their proposed ‘rational’ solution to the man problem is, of course, for men to be ‘genocided’ to 1-10% of the population for the public weal. For example: Miss Arkansas, a beauty pageant contestant, with the safety of being a coddled misandrist in a misandristic culture, openly advocated (preached?) in her official make-the-world-better speech, with the authority of academic feminism, that the genocide of men is the only and logical ‘solution’ to all societal ills:

… it is a proposed global initiative for population reduction which will in a few decades lead to a worldwide male population of roughly 1 to 10% for the purpose of peace and prosperity around the world. This population reduction is the only logical long-term solution. Our plan is one of pacification and submission and many of these short-term solutions are already underway in the western world. So we are confident in our ambition (~0:34 “feminism, y'all gotta own this sh*t”, Karen Straughan, 11 Oct 2012; my emphasis.)

Imagine if a man said that from such a giant public pulpit. The video of that, with the evidence that this feminist ‘beauty’ is not just a one of, is below. In it Karen Straughan shows the history of academic feminists who may have inspired Miss Arkansas and/or gave her the confidence to advocate publicly for male genocide with a pretty smile, big hair, and lots of makeup. Straughan and her many videos, that she began posting about 2010, are a wealth of information with references and resources. (She is also very sarcastic in a manner I find wickedly funny. I like the ‘tone’ she uses that frequently pisses off the NAFLT (Not All Feminists Are Like That) feminists who use tone-policing to deflect from the truth of the message.) And I see her getting increasingly angry with each passing year because feminism, and its misandrist simps, male and female, continued to successfully gaslight their being good while shutting down all criticism in various techniques of verbal and sometimes physical assaults.

So far, to my surprise, I have not found even one feminist talking point that has not been proven by various people in various ways to be contaminated by partial truths, lies by omission and misdirection or are simply out and out bold faced lies — prettified with lipstick, mascara and eau de mendacity. “feminism, y'all gotta own this sh*t” karen straughan. 11 Oct 2012

And did you catch Miss Arkansas’s closing bold claim?

Our plan is one of pacification and submission and many of these short-term solutions are already underway in the western world. So we are confident in our ambition.

What does that mean? Hyperbole? I don’t think so, because it sure looks like the genocide and/or pacification and submission of men is already well begun on different fronts.

Woke is the Wolf of Feminism in Simp’s Clothing

And, like with any family with an unchecked narcissist, the success and nearly ubiquitous prevalence of oppressive feminist gaslighting is a collective failure by people, especially men, to stand up against it since its inception in the 19th century. That failure to cast out the lie and the liars has taken us into, or has been a significant contributing factor to, the explosion of all things woke; family dysfunction, decline, failure and extinction level birthrates; gender confusion including creating the ‘truth’ that men can birth babies; homo-and trans indoctrination practices and homosexual sex ed in grade schools; the ‘happy’ mutilation of children with both drugs and surgery to save from themselves sexual confusion; an epidemic of female unhappiness, depression and addiction to the panoply of associated official and recreational and psychotropic drugs; the effective expulsion of males from all levels of education; and an epidemic rise in rates of male homelessness and suicide.

And all of these contemporary social realities, that are almost certainly a direct consequence of rampant feminism, hiding in trans and other group rights, are verboten from most public discourse. Anyone who dares question this matriarchy or gynocentrism, is viciously and with great media coordination, smeared, castigated, denied and cancelled. In conjunction with the media, at times feminists have even cleverly gaslit a bad outcome as a social ‘good’. Such as the feminist who argued that single parent familial trauma is a good thing for children because their recovery from it makes for stronger people. (See Andrew Wilson EDUCATES Feminist Degen until She SPAGS included above.) Or even how the now ex-feminist, Cassie Jaye, describes how she found herself (feminist-twist) listening to men while investigating the evil rape culture apologists in the men’s rights movement for her documentary, the Red Pill. She began to notice that after every observation an MRA (Mens Rights Activist) told her, let alone actual criticisms, she would feminist-twist their words to mean something they were not saying. See her Tedx talk, MEETING THE ENEMY A feminist comes to terms with the Men's Rights movement | Cassie Jaye | TEDxMarin. ~4:05, 18 Oct 2017.

“You are Blaming Feminism, You Hypocrite, You! Don’t You Teach In Your Yama-Yoga that Each of Us are 100% Personally Responsible For Our Lived Experience? And to Neither Blame Nor Complain?” Sheesh!

‘Yes!’ I replied to that comment. ‘And yet, unless I see the true cause of suffering, how am I to address it any meaningful way?’

I pointed out that suffering expands when we mistake for true that which is false, mistake for false that which is true and confuse as true or false those things that are in reality neutral. That is my translation and quick summary of the first of the five Kleshas of Patañjali’s Yoga Sutras. The kleshas are the five various ways and means we use to avoid seeing the truth of our experience in and of life. And it is that failure to see that is the root cause of all suffering. Gautama Buddha’s first noble truth to reduce suffering is ‘Right Seeing’, for example. Feminism, as a marxist practice, is well versed in how to obfuscate and confuse the truth and so create suffering with lies, twisting language, and accusing the other of what it is itself doing.

And then, after openly receiving the criticism of my ‘blaming and complaining’, I returned with calm determination to continue my investigation into root causes of how so-called feminist gender equality has created so much social and individual damage and suffering. Even after several months of looking I keep finding it to be a seemingly bottomless pit of dark lies and malevolent intention hidden beneath their public feel-good tropes. How can something so vile from the very beginning still be seen as fundamentally ‘good’ even if it has, supposedly, made errors? (Pssst: no errors were made, where we are now is the fruit of the feminist root.)

Does that root have a questionable, or even dark beginning? An occult beginning, with occult meaning to keep hidden or concealed. See the interesting debunking of the roots of feminism being about equality in Occult Feminism: The Secret History of Women's Liberation by Rachel Wilson 25 Feb 2022.

And here are two shorter interviews that discuss the occult roots of feminism, this time with Carrie Gress, author of The End of Woman: How Smashing the Patriarchy Has Destroyed Us.

1) How Feminist Movement Drew Ideology From the Occult. ~26:00. The Daily Signal. 9 Aug 2023.

2) The Dark History of Feminism w/ Carrie Gress.~1:07:32. Human Nature by Roni Fouks. 21 Dec 2024.

Gress claims that The Declaration of Sentiments which was written by Elizabeth Katie Stanton in Seneca Falls, New York in 1848, and which many consider to be the founding document of feminism, was done so at her ‘spirit table’. I laugh at that, now: how did she, and those people attending this ‘writing’ since likely others where there, know whether or not the spirit at the table was good or malevolent? And what about people, men and women, whose religions caution against ‘spirit table talk’ as most likely the voice of the devil? What might they think about being an unconscious spokesperson for a spirit’s emanation and dissertation, if the table talker was indeed malevolent? (Ye shall know them by their fruits, Matthew 7:16) Anyway…

~37:38 [RF] What is the patriarchy in the minds of feminists? How do they describe it and why do they want to get rid of it?
[CG] Yeah, I think that's a great question. And you're absolutely right. This is … just this universal cry of the heart. … But if you ask women what they mean by ‘patriarchy’, you know the short answer … is usually [it is] this oppressive regime that has for all of history … enslaved women. And this … goes back to Mary Wollstonecraft, [a very early feminist who in 1792 published A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects]. It's also in Elizabeth Katie Stanton, her Declaration of Sentiments that she wrote at her spirit table.
This idea is that women have always been oppressed. And … they look back and say how awful women were treated. Well, yes but there's various degrees and stages, different cultures are different. And to say that all women have been oppressed is just completely ahistorical (The Dark History of Feminism w/ Carrie Gress.~1:07:32. 21 Dec 2024. Human Nature by Roni Fouks. My emphasis and slight edit for clarity.)

I Hit My Feminist Bottom and Another Cultural Lie Leaves Me, At Least in Part as Diarrhoea, and Life Becomes Lighter and More Joyful.

Eventually, not too many Sundays ago, I hit the bottom. My bottom, my feminist bottom. And perhaps, in a way something akin to the bottomed out addict, I was stunned, horrified and eventually relieved in mind and body, to discover that I was an unconscious male feminist, aka a ‘closet’ misandrist. And a simp. A cloying obsequious soy-boy simp. I had been one of the Nazi prison guards Jordan Peterson described as what could easily happen to his students in his on-line lectures ‘Maps of Meaning’: I had simped for a lifetime on behalf of gynocentric tyranny. And hadn’t seen it.

While I hadn’t ‘blamed and complained’ — at least not too much in my mind — I discovered that I had, with my ignorance and silence, passively contributed to the unchallenged acceptance of the ‘equality’ argument that feminists espouse. Like all marxist structures, in their internal rhetoric they have twisted the meaning of the ‘good’ word ‘equality’ in order to confuse its common and ‘proper’ usage. (The marxist critic, James Lindsay talks about this with clarity and veracity. See, for example, The Propaganda of Telling the Truth, Falsely. )

I did not appreciate that the feminist ideology of ‘equality’ was to debase and emasculate and kill men as a moral social good because women are, obviously and unquestionably in their declarations, men’s moral superiors.

Before returning to sit here for a ‘final’ edit of this essay, another concise example of that came to me in Hate, the hatred of men, described forcefully, again, by Karen Straughan. And, like with my quiet acquiescence with the convid plandemic, my failure both to see and to speak against malevolence had emboldened the growth of feminism’s narcissistic societal misandry. I had unwittingly let evil pervade society with maybe the cleverest of all trojan horses — that male protection is oppression and families with children are imprisonment.

My unconscious addiction to feminism bottomed out when I realised fully and owned completely my own culpability in the social decay and chaos that abounds. On that Sunday I had the earth of a false truth, another hidden truth-trap, shake under my feet and I knew that my Self had been guilty of failing to see that truth. Wow! [SMH] I had been a feminist simp for more than fifty years. And the day after that realisation of my simpdom I sat in the Oaxaca city bus and saw this odd synchronicity, a sign of pointed humour, perhaps, of my turning towards honouring masculine energy instead of debasing it as a simp to the unbalanced energy of woman as inhuman goddess and arbiter of moral correctness:

Music: Ghostpoet with Nadine Shah: X Marks the Spot.

I was blind to feminist lies despite all my other ‘good’ efforts of truth spelunking that include: my investigation into allopathic faulty science™-practices as money making machinations in my early twenties; my creating two anti-economic courses that I taught in my thirties that debunked economics as a malevolent religion; my intense multi-year examination and excoriation of the lying media as propagandists manufacturing blind consent; my realisation that Freud authorised the secular removal of personal agency and responsibility by elevating psychological specialisation and expertise; my ‘discovery’ that Freudian psychology is basically gaslighting into acceptable the hatred of children (misopaedia) that is societally expressed in our prevalent violence towards them that includes sexual abuse and death and, most recently, the open ‘good’ of childhood genital mutilation beyond the already malevolent male circumcision — and that we have accepted the ‘softening’ of all that with the Orwellian doublespeak words trans and ‘paedophilia’; and, most recently, among other things, becoming aware of the military culling program called the convid plandemic and all those other associated tuxedoed rabbits that turtled me all the way down to learning that vaccines are, and always have been, poisoned needles designed by eugenical malthusians to kill the undeserving and ‘depopulate the planet’ — small pox vaccines were the convid scam of the 19th century.

I saw that it was I, and the simps like me, who had given the space for the clearly deluded ignorant Miss Arkansas and her ilk to advocate male genocide by not calling it and them out a long time ago: I had, by omission, supported the steady creep into society of this malignant evil built on lies and the abuse of language.

That came with a huge, one of my biggest, 'ahas’ of relief. And more unconscious self-disgust was exposed. Another cultural lie laid bare. A few hours later I went to bed early and slept for 13 hours. The following day I purged myself with diarrhoea. And, wonderfully, the nearly crippling pain I’d been experiencing in my hip subsided to almost nothing. I attributed that relief to my having reduced my 'hip-ocrisy’. At least for a time, because the pain crept back although in a less intense and different form. And so I continue to be a hip-work in process, as I look to figure out how this form of the Fisher King’s emasculating wound continues to be asking me to learn or see something else.

With hindsight this process of struggling to see and/or to deny that there was something to see and/or to push down that which was pushing up to be seen, also contributed to my hiatus. In those months I was often tired in ways I hadn’t been in several years. I wasn’t writing for 24hr stretches — physically couldn’t. I found this body demanding 8-12 hour sleeps instead of what had become, typically, 5-6 hours.

So in those months I discovered the marxist malevolence of feminism and my participation in it by having stood by with blind ignorance as soy-boy simp as it metastasised into all parts of society until we are now rationalising as good the genital mutilation of children, while ignoring real world situations where there are examples of male tyranny and female malevolence that could be addressed to reduce human suffering.

Closing Synchronicity Alert — Disclosing the Lie is to Free Space for the Truth to Set You Free.

After writing ‘there are examples of male tyranny and female malevolence that could be addressed to reduce human suffering’ as the concluding sentence of this essay, I paused to clear my mind before a final re-read and edit. And I thought ‘At last, this short(?) return to substack essay was done! All that was left were ‘just’ the logistics and, perhaps, a few minor final edits and to prepare to record the audio. With that it was time to break from the pc to rest while making supper. And while cooking, listen to something. What? It used to be music then it was Spanish: now with deconstructing feminism, it is ‘social' media.

I went into my very long 'Watch Later’ YouTube playlist and picked something. And there it was, a bombshell synchronicity from Angela Stanton-King talking with Jesse Lee Peterson. And I am given yet another new exposed feminist lie that shatters yet another feminist foundational trope: abortion.

And, well, actually, the me-too movement too, because, aw shucks, why would any woman lie about rape? So, that rape lie wasn’t disclosed until 2005, and yet the consequences of that lie haven’t been held accountable for honest disclosure to reframe abortion. And it was that lie that began the legalised killing of babies in the womb with Roe vs Wade.

Is it not fascinating that that woman’s lie about being raped by four men was not held accountable and that it was not enough to slow down the me-too women’s movement ten years later. After the lie was exposed feminists, themselves, knowingly lied even while holding themselves ups as the moral truthers who, without evidence, have destroyed, even lead to the deaths, of many thousands of innocent men. For example, see Candace Owens’s series, Harvey Speaks, to see how women’s lies against an immoral, but not criminal man, helped to destroy one of the most powerful men in Hollywood. (Another example is Amber Heard’s lies to steal the wealth and reputation of Johnny Depp.)

More than 100 women lied that they had been raped by Weinstein. The evidence that they all lied was so overwhelming that all but three who were caught in an outright physically measurable and tangible lie, were subsequently dismissed from the trial. Not one was charged for perjury. A corrupt court system§ turned a blind eye to the lies of the three of the women, of whom only two had had consensual sex and the last a made up rape story. The evidence of the lies is overwhelming and yet Weinstein hasn’t been released from prison. Yet.

§Synchronicity. While editing-in the abortion lie synchronicity, yet another synchronicity came up to provide evidence of the corruption of the legal system. While it isn’t directly connected to feminism, the synchronicity is even stronger because it confirms the corruption of the judicial system beyond just where feminism has had the strongest impact. This came via small town lawyer Jeff Childers being chosen by a billionaire because the high profile lawyers she had hired to help her with charges involving the January 6th false flag event, gave her clearly malevolent advice. See: TURNING POINTS ☙ Thursday, September 11, 2025 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠, (see paragraph beginning with ‘I met Charlie Kirk…’.)

If that sounds chaotic, it is. The Weinstein series is an important disclosure or unmasking of women as equally capable and willing to lie as all the other humans on the planet.

The Stanton-King interview is a beautiful one, an honest woman looking into women’s hearts of darkness and the malevolence they created by gaslighting people into believe the lie of women’s moral superiority to men. And this time, that power of the female lie was used to empower feminism’s greatest accomplishments: mass abortion as a moral good even though it is the killing of truly innocent nascent human life.

Angela Stanton-King Joins Jesse! (Ep. 381). ~ 22:54. The Fallen State. 8 Nov 2024.

22:54 [ASK] I believe that God has a purpose for every life that he creates. And I believe that someone has to be a voice for the unborn. And I believe that every abortion is a tragedy and I'm educated to understand that abortion is black genocide. I'm aware of the fact that 20 million black lives have been aborted since the passing of Roe vs Wade. I'm also educated on the fact that Roe vs Wade was legalised off of a lie. Norma [McCorvey]§ stating that she was raped by four black men that never happened. I'm also educated on the fact that—
[JLP] She apologised, she came back later, right, about [what] she did.
[ASK] She did. She also never had an abortion.
I'm also educated on the fact that they have strategically placed 80% of their abortion clinics in Black communities while there are no abortion clinics at the border.
…
26:51 [JLP] These so-called civil right leaders, they don't seem to care about the abortion issue, when they're supposed to be the leaders … of the blacks. You know they are part of the so-called Civil Rights Movement. Why don't they care about abortion? They know that Margaret Sang—
[ASK] Because abortion is convenient. And they aren’t any better than the KKK. I cannot understand how you are sitting up here blaming white people for racism, but you can't wait to go abort your own black baby. You are the creators of black life! You're demanding that everybody value black life. Except for the black people that create life.
It's an absolute shame! And it's hypocritical and it's something to laugh at. And I think that's been one of the biggest realisations for me. … [I go to] the March for Life, and every time I attended a March for Life it was one of the most beautiful painful experiences that I've ever had because I always have to answer for black people cuz me and my godmom and maybe one or two other people are there. Only four black people standing in a whole sea of nearly 30,000 white people fighting for their race, fighting for their children.

March for Life: Where’s the Blacks? Music: Talking Heads — Seen and Not Seen.

And they're asking me … where, where is everybody? Like why, why don't they care? Y'all don't care about your baby? You don't care about your future?

Here is the evidence of the rape lie in a sworn hearing from the woman whose lie helped pass the American abortion law, Roe vs Wade. (Of course, the 100+ women who lied about Harvey Weinstein were also under oath. Hmmmmm. And we are to believe, automatically, women and ‘feminists’ as unequivocal truth tellers because, why would they lie?!)

Testimony of Norma McCorvey, (The former Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade). June 23, 2005
…
2. Abortion is a shameful and secret thing. I wanted to justify my desire for an abortion in my own mind, as almost every woman who participates in the killing of her own child must also do. I made up the story that I had been raped [by four black men] to help justify my abortion. Why would I make up a lie to justify my conduct? Abortion itself is a lie and it is based on lies. My lawyers didn't tell me that abortion would be used for sex selection, but later when I was a pro-choice advocate and worked in abortion clinics, I found women who were using abortion as a means of gender selection. My lawyers didn't tell me that future children would be getting abortions and losing their innocence. Yet I saw young girls getting abortions who were never the same. In 1973, when I learned about the Roe v. Wade decision from the newspapers, not my lawyers, I didn't feel real elated. After all, the decision didn't help me at all. I never had an abortion. I gave my baby up for adoption since the baby was born before the legal case was over. I am glad today that that child is alive and that I did not elect to abort. I was actually silent about my role in abortion for many years and did not speak out at all. Then, in the 1980's, in order to justify my own conduct, with many conflicting emotions, I did come forward publicly to support Roe v. Wade. Keep in mind that I had not had an abortion and did not know much about it at the time.

Again, thank you for reading. End of essay.

Post Ultimate Closing Synchronicity

I completely finished editing-in the synchronicity addendum above, with the intention to post the essay the following day. Then I attended my final lesson to roll my own cigars. The result was I rolled, for the first time, more than twenty cigars — it was super fun! Loved it. Here are the ‘one ofs’ — a little rough, and yet a delightfully good first effort. I look forward to mastering the practice. (The ‘proper’ ones are still resting under wrap for a couple of days.)

Some of the hand made, ’one-of’ Oaxaca Cigars by me! Music: Seckou Keita, Catrin Finch — 1677.

(If anyone is interested in a hand made Oaxaca cigar, message me.)

Immediately afterwards I went to and returned, late, from a birthday celebration near by. I turned on the PC to catch up on a couple of things before bed and in the YouTube feed the following was sitting waiting for me:

The Moment I Realised Feminism Is A Lie. Music: Fulvio Caldini — Clockwork Toccata, Op. 68.

Again, thank you for reading.